Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jelte Fennema <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Jesse Zhang <sbjesse(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner
Date: 2023-04-30 12:57:39
Message-ID: 5b9dede4-3c70-b8c1-c53e-26cdf4125b35@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2023-04-28 Fr 05:25, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2023-Feb-05, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> So here's a diff made from running perltidy v20221112 with the additional
>> setting --valign-exclusion-list=", = => || && if unless"
> I ran this experimentally with perltidy 20230309, and compared that with
> the --novalign behavior (not to propose the latter -- just to be aware
> of what else is vertical alignment doing.)

Thanks for looking.

>
> Based on the differences between both, I think we'll definitely want to
> include =~ and |= in this list, and I think we should discuss whether to
> also include "or" (for "do_stuff or die()" type of constructs) and "qw"
> (mainly used in 'use Foo qw(one two)' import lists). All these have
> effects (albeit smaller than the list you gave) on our existing code.

I'm good with all of these I think

>
>
> If you change from an exclusion list to --novalign then you lose
> alignment of trailing # comments, which personally I find a loss, even
> though they're still a multi-line effect. Another change would be that
> it ditches alignment of "{" but that only changes msvc/Install.pm, so I
> think we shouldn't worry; and then there's this one:
>
> -use PostgreSQL::Test::Utils ();
> +use PostgreSQL::Test::Utils ();
> use PostgreSQL::Test::BackgroundPsql ();
>
> which I think we could just change to qw() if we cared enough (but I bet
> we don't).

Yeah, me too.

>
>
> All in all, I think sticking to
> --valign-exclusion-list=", = => =~ |= || && if or qw unless"
> is a good deal.
>

wfm

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2023-04-30 13:02:04 Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2023-04-30 06:35:30 Re: Direct I/O