Re: LLVM 22

From: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com>
Subject: Re: LLVM 22
Date: 2026-03-13 13:36:04
Message-ID: afa3914d40d592fc57f50da0d1e99d91f5c8b7dc.camel@gunduz.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Sun, 2026-01-11 at 20:09 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> A new unrelated assertion started firing in LLVM main/22 a few days
> ago:
>
>     v_nullbytemask = l_int8_const(lc, 1 << ((attnum) & 0x07));
>     Assertion failed: (llvm::isUIntN(BitWidth, val) && "Value is not
> an N-bit unsigned value")
>
> Here is a fix for that.

Fedora pushed 22.1.0 to both Fedora 44 beta and rawhide repos, so I
tested these patches. Builds are fine and all regression tests pass.
Anything else I should check?

Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, PostgreSQL Major Contributor
BlueSky: @devrim.gunduz.org , @gunduz.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2026-03-13 13:47:52 Re: IS JSON predicate support for domain base type as JSON/JSONB/BYTEA/TEXT
Previous Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2026-03-13 13:34:49 Re: Speed up COPY FROM text/CSV parsing using SIMD