Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded

On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 4:56 AM Wolfgang Walther
<walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de> wrote:
> Any ideas?

I'd look into whether there is a difference in the rules it uses for
deciding not to trust LD_LIBRARY_PATH, which seems to be around here
somewhere:

https://github.com/bminor/musl/blob/7ada6dde6f9dc6a2836c3d92c2f762d35fd229e0/ldso/dynlink.c#L1812

I wonder if you can break into an affected program and check out the
magic there. FWIW on MacOS something equivalent happens at the moment
we execute a shell, because the system shell is 'code signed' and that
OS treats signed stuff similar to setuid binaries for this purpose
(IIRC setting SHELL to point to a suitable unsigned shell could work
around the problem there?)

Another interesting thing that came up when I googled musl/glibc
differences -- old but looks plausibly still true (not that I expect
our code to be modifying that stuff in place, just something to
check):

https://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2014/08/31/14