| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Liudmila Mantrova <l(dot)mantrova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Support for jsonpath .datetime() method |
| Date: | 2019-08-01 10:30:01 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGJHOFCLTVmPNdxen1Z52gM7MBRGy_eOE03HhyG3CS4LEA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 2:43 AM Andrew Dunstan
<andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 7/23/19 6:48 PM, Nikita Glukhov wrote:
> > Some concrete pieces of review:
> >> + <row>
> >> + <entry><literal>FF1</literal></entry>
> >> + <entry>decisecond (0-9)</entry>
> >> + </row>
> >>
> >> Let's not use such weird terms as "deciseconds". We could say
> >> "fractional seconds, 1 digit" etc. or something like that.
> > And what about "tenths of seconds", "hundredths of seconds"?
>
> Yes, those are much better.
I've moved this to the September CF, still in "Waiting on Author" state.
--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-08-01 10:30:10 | Re: Multivariate MCV list vs. statistics target |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-08-01 10:24:54 | Re: How to retain lesser paths at add_path()? |