| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Liudmila Mantrova <l(dot)mantrova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Support for jsonpath .datetime() method |
| Date: | 2019-07-26 14:43:07 |
| Message-ID: | 0409fb42-18d3-bdb7-37ab-d742d5313a40@2ndQuadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/23/19 6:48 PM, Nikita Glukhov wrote:
> Some concrete pieces of review:
>> + <row>
>> + <entry><literal>FF1</literal></entry>
>> + <entry>decisecond (0-9)</entry>
>> + </row>
>>
>> Let's not use such weird terms as "deciseconds". We could say
>> "fractional seconds, 1 digit" etc. or something like that.
> And what about "tenths of seconds", "hundredths of seconds"?
Yes, those are much better.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Anastasia Lubennikova | 2019-07-26 14:56:05 | Re: Optimze usage of immutable functions as relation |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2019-07-26 14:41:50 | Re: Support for jsonpath .datetime() method |