Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~
Date: 2023-05-15 02:08:32
Message-ID: CA+hUKG++qE9uVjQaTTD7oaC8a2T3h8K50=Eqyx9uUZvOHa__ww@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

After 495ed0e, do these references to Windows SDK 8.1 still make sense?

src/sgml/install-windows.sgml: as well as standalone Windows SDK
releases 8.1a to 10.
src/sgml/install-windows.sgml: <productname>Microsoft Windows
SDK</productname> version 8.1a to 10 or

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2023-05-15 02:19:53 RE: walsender performance regression due to logical decoding on standby changes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-05-15 01:36:53 Re: 'converts internal representation to "..."' comment is confusing