| From: | Jorge Solórzano <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion |
| Date: | 2016-11-29 23:54:41 |
| Message-ID: | CA+cVU8MWeV8P1_47ORiB7_q94i6P=huOaatvQr0DYpD8XT6Avg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Or better yet, simply append .jre8 to the version, that way 42.0.0.jre8 >
42.0.0.jre7 > 42.0.0.jre6 and when Java 9 comes out it will be easy to use
.jre9 and there will be no problem to identify what Java version it target.
El mar., 29 de nov. de 2016 10:57 AM, Jorge Solórzano <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com>
escribió:
> Vladimir, what do you think about using classifier in pgjdbc? It probably
> can simplify build of different jar and at the same time have proper
> versioning in maven.
>
> In maven rules 42.0.0.jre7 > 42.0.0 (jre8) so this should help with
> correct versioning.
>
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3092085/building-same-project-in-maven-with-different-artifactid-based-on-jdk-used
>
>
> El lun., 28 de nov. de 2016 3:17 PM, Vladimir Sitnikov <
> sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> escribió:
>
> I've pushed 42.0.0-SNAPSHOT to the pgjdbc/master.
>
> Vladimir
>
> --
>
> Jorge
>
--
Jorge Solórzano
me.jorsol.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2016-11-30 01:31:51 | Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-11-29 20:14:48 | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |