Re: Deprecating Hash Indexes

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Deprecating Hash Indexes
Date: 2012-10-15 19:00:46
Message-ID: CA+U5nML++a=82Z-A9qbtqpumuFtY_fS04DpBTZGKgP5_BUvf1A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 15 October 2012 19:46, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> I would be in favor of moving them to contrib for 9.4. Assuming that
>> someone can figure out how this interacts with the existing system table
>> opclasses. Them being in /contrib would also put less pressure on the
>> next new hacker who decides to take them on as a feature; they can
>> improve them incrementally without needing to fix 100% of issues in the
>> first go.
>
> Is there anything currently in contrib that defines its own WAL
> records and replay methods? Are there hooks for doing so?

Not to date. Search for rmgr plugins for previous discussions.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2012-10-15 19:04:43 Re: Deprecating Hash Indexes
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2012-10-15 19:00:38 Re: [RFC][PATCH] wal decoding, attempt #2 - Design Documents (really attached)