| From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Deprecating Hash Indexes |
| Date: | 2012-10-15 18:46:40 |
| Message-ID: | CAMkU=1x9-yoCqUU9TB5hF3wYuA9BCc7SMeUaNCBjVeXnwcu9Jg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I would be in favor of moving them to contrib for 9.4. Assuming that
> someone can figure out how this interacts with the existing system table
> opclasses. Them being in /contrib would also put less pressure on the
> next new hacker who decides to take them on as a feature; they can
> improve them incrementally without needing to fix 100% of issues in the
> first go.
Is there anything currently in contrib that defines its own WAL
records and replay methods? Are there hooks for doing so?
Cheers,
Jeff
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2012-10-15 18:49:45 | Re: [RFC][PATCH] wal decoding, attempt #2 - Design Documents (really attached) |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2012-10-15 18:44:14 | Re: [RFC][PATCH] wal decoding, attempt #2 - Design Documents (really attached) |