| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC][PATCH] wal decoding, attempt #2 - Design Documents (really attached) |
| Date: | 2012-10-15 19:00:38 |
| Message-ID: | 507C5D56.6090609@2ndQuadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/15/2012 04:54 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> PS. I'd love to see a basic Slony plugin for this, for example, to see how
>> >much extra code on top of the posted patches you need to write in a plugin
>> >like that to make it functional. I'm worried that it's a lot..
> I agree. I would go so far as to say that if Slony can't integrate
> with this work and use it in place of their existing change-capture
> facility, that's sufficient grounds for unconditional rejection.
The fact that current work starts with "apply cache" instead of streaming
makes the semantics very close to how londiste and slony do this.
Therefore I don't think there will be any problems with "can't" though
it may be
that there will be nobody actually doing it, at least not before January.
------------
Hannu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-10-15 19:00:46 | Re: Deprecating Hash Indexes |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-10-15 18:59:21 | Re: [RFC][PATCH] wal decoding, attempt #2 - Design Documents (really attached) |