Re: [PATCH] Fix pg_rewind false positives caused by shutdown-only WAL

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: BharatDB <bharatdbpg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix pg_rewind false positives caused by shutdown-only WAL
Date: 2025-09-30 14:38:38
Message-ID: CA+Tgmobpsa87vGevUaQbGgnEY9BdeUgPOFGWMCqgfQ0obXu9=w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Please stop sending AI-generated messages that you haven't reviewed
for accuracy. You now seem to be conflating what you did or didn't do
with what Srinath did or didn't do. Unless BharatDB/Soumya/manimurali
is the same person as Srinath, that's incorrect.

The short version here is that this patch has no future because the
entire premise of it is incorrect. There's no point in sending another
version ever, as far as I can see. If you or anyone else disagrees, we
should talk about that.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-09-30 14:41:08 Re: anonymous unions (C11)
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-09-30 14:36:32 Re: pg_restore documentation and --create/--single-transaction limitation