From: | Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | BharatDB <bharatdbpg(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Fix pg_rewind false positives caused by shutdown-only WAL |
Date: | 2025-09-30 17:24:39 |
Message-ID: | CAFC+b6oCjWxshOoq=8x+VEwcawYzruKn_FLLFzUxtsgPKe-ozg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Robert,
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 8:08 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please stop sending AI-generated messages that you haven't reviewed
> for accuracy. You now seem to be conflating what you did or didn't do
> with what Srinath did or didn't do.
+1
> Unless BharatDB/Soumya/manimurali
> is the same person as Srinath
>
no, i am the original Srinath (SrinathIsVerified) lol.
>
> The short version here is that this patch has no future because the
> entire premise of it is incorrect. There's no point in sending another
> version ever, as far as I can see. If you or anyone else disagrees, we
> should talk about that.
>
Can you please once confirm this, did you mean that this is not even an
actual problem to fix or only this patch's logic which I provided does
not make sense?, because i am trying out come up with another patch based
on your inputs regarding considering controlfile changes ,
ignoring RUNNING_XACTS records, and to use XLogRecGetRmid test.
--
Thanks,
Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-09-30 17:57:46 | Re: Why cannot alter column type when a view depends on it? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-09-30 16:41:29 | Re: The ability of postgres to determine loss of files of the main fork |