From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
Cc: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: anonymous unions (C11) |
Date: | 2025-09-30 14:41:08 |
Message-ID: | CAExHW5tcypg4JV0mrcZXCKUFMgQbkOtTNu1iSe8uOqDBW=+ODg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 5:14 PM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2025-Sep-30, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>
> > Attached patch fixes those errors for me.
>
> > diff --git a/src/common/cryptohash.c b/src/common/cryptohash.c
> > index fc0555d2f99..e8a35c2ec35 100644
> > --- a/src/common/cryptohash.c
> > +++ b/src/common/cryptohash.c
> > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ struct pg_cryptohash_ctx
> > pg_sha256_ctx sha256;
> > pg_sha384_ctx sha384;
> > pg_sha512_ctx sha512;
> > - } data;
> > + };
> > };
>
> Isn't this patch 0015 in Peter's series?
I found the compilation errors after pulling the latest sources at
that time. I thought the patch series is committed and hence this
report and patch. Didn't look at the patch series.
But the problematic commit has been reverted since then.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2025-09-30 14:48:00 | Re: allow benign typedef redefinitions (C11) |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2025-09-30 14:38:38 | Re: [PATCH] Fix pg_rewind false positives caused by shutdown-only WAL |