| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions |
| Date: | 2016-05-25 00:34:10 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobiMg+xebeyO-j_yx+Wm_7vuXmmJ4A6JHP7qWA4v8z3fQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Sounds to me that this is part of the cleanup of a 9.6 feature and should be
>> in that release.
>
> Yes, I agree. By the way, the patch completely ignores the fact that
> some of the modules already had a version bump in the 9.6 development
> cycle, like pageinpect. You don't need to create a new version script
> in such cases.
I think now that beta1 has shipped we would want to bump the version either way.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-05-25 00:36:42 | Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-05-25 00:27:04 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table |