From: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions |
Date: | 2016-05-25 01:23:23 |
Message-ID: | 5744FE8B.5010101@proxel.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/25/2016 02:34 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Sounds to me that this is part of the cleanup of a 9.6 feature and should be
>>> in that release.
>>
>> Yes, I agree. By the way, the patch completely ignores the fact that
>> some of the modules already had a version bump in the 9.6 development
>> cycle, like pageinpect. You don't need to create a new version script
>> in such cases.
>
> I think now that beta1 has shipped we would want to bump the version either way.
I am fine with doing it either way. I will leave it as new versions for
everything now then and if people want to I can merge the two upgrade
scripts.
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2016-05-25 01:25:13 | Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-05-25 01:13:12 | Re: BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table |