Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions

From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions
Date: 2016-05-25 01:23:23
Message-ID: 5744FE8B.5010101@proxel.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/25/2016 02:34 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Sounds to me that this is part of the cleanup of a 9.6 feature and should be
>>> in that release.
>>
>> Yes, I agree. By the way, the patch completely ignores the fact that
>> some of the modules already had a version bump in the 9.6 development
>> cycle, like pageinpect. You don't need to create a new version script
>> in such cases.
>
> I think now that beta1 has shipped we would want to bump the version either way.

I am fine with doing it either way. I will leave it as new versions for
everything now then and if people want to I can merge the two upgrade
scripts.

Andreas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Karlsson 2016-05-25 01:25:13 Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-05-25 01:13:12 Re: BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table