| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Everaldo Canuto <everaldo(dot)canuto(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit |
| Date: | 2017-12-12 20:42:08 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobRfusCQXBbUwXCFfK61VjbX6=NY=+YcQg4nXEVqSwuDA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Everaldo Canuto
<everaldo(dot)canuto(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Sorry to be so sarcastic on last comment but, I am a little frustrated, it
> is not like this patch is big and need a lots of review, it is already done
> and it takes 15 minutes from me and it was the first time I look at Postgres
> source code. Really sorry.
It's not really done in any useful sense, because it has a -1 vote
from a prominent committer. There is however an alternative proposal
which has several +1 votes, including from that same committer and
from me. If you would like to produce a patch that implements that
counter-proposal, it might go somewhere. Very little of significance
gets done around here without some give and take; I know that's
sometimes frustrating, but it's how it is.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-12-12 20:49:53 | Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit |
| Previous Message | David Steele | 2017-12-12 20:39:53 | Re: Error generating coverage report |