| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification |
| Date: | 2016-03-10 19:51:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZQUyqV0zL742FB48NcXwELbx+a_98LdAOZtXAnhv6fqJQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> ISTM, that there's good enough reasons to go either way; I don't see
>> what we're gaining by making these private. That just encourages
>> copy-paste coding.
>
> +1. Frustrating Citus's attempt to open-source their stuff is not in
> the project's interest.
I agree.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2016-03-10 19:59:28 | Re: auto_explain sample rate |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2016-03-10 19:50:12 | Re: WIP: Detecting SSI conflicts before reporting constraint violations |