Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument
Date: 2023-10-04 15:51:32
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob7FnRGq775hwz8pjAMe7762n+DdNmihDaB-iJ4BR9_vQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:27 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Here's a patch. I didn't address the class="parameter" stuff at all. I
> figured it would be best to handle that separately.

I guess I'll vote for including class=parameter in this addition for
now, as that appears to be the majority position in the documentation
today. If we get a consensus to change something, so be it. But also,
if you don't want to do that, so be it.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2023-10-04 16:12:14 Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-10-04 15:29:07 Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?