Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Brown <michael(dot)brown(at)discourse(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?
Date: 2023-10-04 15:29:07
Message-ID: 20231004152907.GD3178@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 01:56:08PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I think it's a bit much to add a whole appendix for that little content.

I'm inclined to agree.

> We have a collection of platform-specific notes in chapter 19, including
> file-system-related notes in section 19.2. Maybe it could be put there?

I will give this a try.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2023-10-04 15:51:32 Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-10-04 15:27:50 Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument