Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Maksim Milyutin <m(dot)milyutin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode
Date: 2017-04-12 15:36:58
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob5RzxegxTXGNtpVODrfw1QUxkouzvSkw_O78mwfOANew@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Alright. So I made it into two patches instead: 0001 fixes the bug that
> validateCheckConstraint() tries to scan partitioned tables and 0002 makes
> trying to convert a partitioned table to a view a user error.

Committed together, after updating the regression test outputs to make
the tests pass. You forgot to update the expected output file in
0002.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2017-04-12 15:41:57 Re: the need to finish
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2017-04-12 15:32:02 Re: snapbuild woes