Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Maksim Milyutin <m(dot)milyutin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode
Date: 2017-04-13 00:35:07
Message-ID: bba6348e-7a2c-9f01-bc64-ad0b0a95ac16@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017/04/13 0:36, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> Alright. So I made it into two patches instead: 0001 fixes the bug that
>> validateCheckConstraint() tries to scan partitioned tables and 0002 makes
>> trying to convert a partitioned table to a view a user error.
>
> Committed together, after updating the regression test outputs to make
> the tests pass. You forgot to update the expected output file in
> 0002.

Oops, sorry about that. Thanks for fixing and committing.

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-04-13 00:40:39 Re: Function to control physical replication slot
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-04-13 00:29:59 Re: snapbuild woes