Re: pgsql: Teach DSM registry to ERROR if attaching to an uninitialized ent

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Teach DSM registry to ERROR if attaching to an uninitialized ent
Date: 2025-11-25 20:58:47
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob=uQymuQuWfsnk3ixe6BEURK1Fjm-0WUy7E5YVsWoNHA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 12:45 PM Nathan Bossart
<nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I gave your idea a try, and I like the result a lot. IMHO it makes the
> code much easier to reason about.

I looked through this and I agree this looks good. Thanks for working on it.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-11-25 21:16:00 Re: pgsql: Teach DSM registry to ERROR if attaching to an uninitialized ent
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2025-11-25 19:40:10 pgsql: Remove a useless length check.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2025-11-25 21:03:02 Re: The pgperltidy diffs in HEAD
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2025-11-25 20:51:06 Re: Bug in amcheck?