Re: Unify drop-by-OID functions

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unify drop-by-OID functions
Date: 2020-05-05 17:56:48
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaxxKRyhZ+LdYOhDWBrm-eW8Qikihw+xj+o2Jx6sjuaBw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:43 PM Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I see, the famous "cliché".

By using the word cliché, and by putting it in quotes, you seem to
suggest that you consider my argument dubious. However, I stand by it.
Code shouldn't be changed without understanding the reasons behind the
current coding. Doing so very often breaks things.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-05-05 18:10:24 Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2020-05-05 17:50:11 Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft