| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: postgres_fdw: evaluate placeholdervars on remote server |
| Date: | 2017-09-15 15:19:19 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoawtJWe-V21ZH0-jQ=ubbyXtYPBZPqpD_fZCxsR8eanSA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> Have you had a chance to look at this such that we can expect a rebased version
> of this patch during the commitfest?
Frankly, I think things where there was a ping multiple weeks before
the CommitFest started and no rebase before it started should be
regarded as untimely submissions, and summarily marked Returned with
Feedback. The CommitFest is supposed to be a time to get things that
are ready before it starts committed before it ends. Some amount of
back-and-forth during the CF is of course to be expected, but we don't
even really have enough bandwidth to deal with the patches that are
being timely updated, never mind the ones that aren't.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-09-15 15:25:30 | Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2017-09-15 15:00:44 | Re: Renaming PG_GETARG functions (was Re: PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY?) |