| From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: postgres_fdw: evaluate placeholdervars on remote server |
| Date: | 2017-09-27 03:20:43 |
| Message-ID: | 2b79de01-d266-9306-54c0-65505c468f1f@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017/09/16 0:19, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>> Have you had a chance to look at this such that we can expect a rebased version
>> of this patch during the commitfest?
>
> Frankly, I think things where there was a ping multiple weeks before
> the CommitFest started and no rebase before it started should be
> regarded as untimely submissions, and summarily marked Returned with
> Feedback. The CommitFest is supposed to be a time to get things that
> are ready before it starts committed before it ends. Some amount of
> back-and-forth during the CF is of course to be expected, but we don't
> even really have enough bandwidth to deal with the patches that are
> being timely updated, never mind the ones that aren't.
Agreed. I marked this as RWF. Thank you.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-09-27 03:32:52 | Re: Multicolumn hash indexes |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-09-27 02:28:31 | Use of RangeVar for partitioned tables in autovacuum |