| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts when some errors occur |
| Date: | 2017-09-14 20:15:39 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoat-kYwBM2yNH6iQBa_M0Gp2X_FiX45dcSz9L33MVaAJw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:23 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> Sorry again, but how can we handle this? A non-PG-developer, Tels (and possibly someone else, IIRC) claimed that the behavior be changed during the beta period. Why should we do nothing?
Because we do not have consensus on changing it. I've decided that
you're right, but several other people are saying "no". I can't just
go change it in the face of objections.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2017-09-14 20:19:09 | Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts when some errors occur |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-09-14 20:13:46 | Re: Patches that don't apply or don't compile: 2017-09-12 |