| From: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'Robert Haas' <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts when some errors occur |
| Date: | 2017-09-15 07:54:28 |
| Message-ID: | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F7BB500@G01JPEXMBYT05 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Tom, Michael,
Robert, Noah
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Robert Haas
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:23 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
> <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> > Sorry again, but how can we handle this? A non-PG-developer, Tels (and
> possibly someone else, IIRC) claimed that the behavior be changed during
> the beta period. Why should we do nothing?
>
> Because we do not have consensus on changing it. I've decided that you're
> right, but several other people are saying "no". I can't just go change
> it in the face of objections.
How are things decided in cases like this? Does the RMT team usually do some kind of poll?
So far, there are four proponents (Tels (non-PG-developer), David J., Robert and me), and two opponents (Tom and Michael).
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2017-09-15 08:10:38 | Re: COMMIT TRIGGERs, take n, implemented with CONSTRAINT TRIGGERS |
| Previous Message | Gaddam Sai Ram | 2017-09-15 07:51:33 | Error: dsa_area could not attach to a segment that has been freed |