Re: Trying to break online checksums with LLMs

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Trying to break online checksums with LLMs
Date: 2026-09-10 20:51:26
Message-ID: CA+TgmoafHbFwzgKQZn+UgEXHYs_UmC4Wrc5pricG7--di8po6w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 4:37 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Don't we have logic somewhere to clean up orphaned relation files?

Uh ... no?

I mean, temp tables get cleaned up and unlogged tables get reset to
empty, but the goal of being able to remove permanent relation files
instead of permanently leaking them has, to my knowledge, thus far
eluded us. I had hope to address that when working on UNDO, and other
people have tried as well, but unless I've missed something big,
nobody has thus far succeeded.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jochen Bandhauer 2026-09-10 21:03:17 Re: Trying to break online checksums with LLMs
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2026-09-10 20:48:22 Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes