Re: Trying to break online checksums with LLMs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Trying to break online checksums with LLMs
Date: 2026-09-10 21:39:54
Message-ID: 931425.1789076394@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 4:37 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Don't we have logic somewhere to clean up orphaned relation files?

> Uh ... no?

> I mean, temp tables get cleaned up and unlogged tables get reset to
> empty, but the goal of being able to remove permanent relation files
> instead of permanently leaking them has, to my knowledge, thus far
> eluded us.

You're right, I was thinking of temp-table cleanup.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2026-09-10 21:41:54 fixes for a few GUC descriptions
Previous Message Robert Haas 2026-09-10 21:35:44 Re: Trying to break online checksums with LLMs