| From: | "Greg Burd" <greg(at)burd(dot)me> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Daniel Gustafsson" <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Trying to break online checksums with LLMs |
| Date: | 2026-09-10 21:04:17 |
| Message-ID: | 5d89549c-117e-45ae-b934-a2bb71c82a79@app.fastmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 10, 2026, at 4:51 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 4:37 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Don't we have logic somewhere to clean up orphaned relation files?
>
> Uh ... no?
>
> I mean, temp tables get cleaned up and unlogged tables get reset to
> empty, but the goal of being able to remove permanent relation files
> instead of permanently leaking them has, to my knowledge, thus far
> eluded us. I had hope to address that when working on UNDO, and other
> people have tried as well, but unless I've missed something big,
> nobody has thus far succeeded.
This is incoming with my resurrection of the UNDO work you and other
did and the addition of what I call "FILEOPS".
ETA... a week, target v20.
-greg
> --
> Robert Haas
> EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2026-09-10 21:08:07 | Re: Trying to break online checksums with LLMs |
| Previous Message | Jochen Bandhauer | 2026-09-10 21:03:17 | Re: Trying to break online checksums with LLMs |