Re: s/xlog/wal/ in tools and function names?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov(at)google(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: s/xlog/wal/ in tools and function names?
Date: 2016-12-01 18:21:46
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaZPgyTfPBrJNu=D+6CQD69LnbEdhE8Xx1y0frMZDjooA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov(at)google(dot)com> wrote:
> I've found myself wondering "where is my xlog" after running
> pg_switch_xlog() in 10.0.
>
> Renaming pg_xlog to pg_wal created inconsistency between tools, function
> names and directory name on disk.
>
> Should we also:
>
> - rename pg_switch_xlog and friends to pg_switch_wal?
> - rename pg_recievexlog to pg_revievewal (and others in bin/)?
> - rename pg_xlogdump to pg_waldump?

I think yes to all.

> - if we do rename, should we keep aliases for functions and symlinks for
> tools?

I think no.

> - anything else?

There are some SQL-callable functions that should probably be renamed
to match, too.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-12-01 18:23:21 Re: [HACKERS] 答复: [HACKERS] postgres 1 个(共 2 个) can pg 9.6 vacuum freeze skip page on index?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-12-01 17:05:36 Re: PoC: Partial sort