Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing
Date: 2018-02-22 16:10:57
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZYBc7HO6CfCTaksD40UyeM8+6_ShXs6XrYu5H0UC4SLQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:06 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> Attached is an updated version for that.
>
> Thanks for updating the patch.

Committed with a few changes. The big one was that I got rid of the
local variable is_update in ExecSetupPartitionTupleRouting. That
saved a level of indentation on a substantial chunk of code, and it
turns out that test was redundant anyway.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikolay Shaplov 2018-02-22 16:48:46 [PATCH] get rid of StdRdOptions, use individual binary reloptions representation for each relation kind instead
Previous Message Andrey Borodin 2018-02-22 15:47:43 Re: Online enabling of checksums