Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing
Date: 2018-02-23 01:05:43
Message-ID: c5cf0d2f-eb34-0c8e-b51d-5f2416208273@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018/02/23 1:10, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:06 PM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> Attached is an updated version for that.
>>
>> Thanks for updating the patch.
>
> Committed with a few changes. The big one was that I got rid of the
> local variable is_update in ExecSetupPartitionTupleRouting. That
> saved a level of indentation on a substantial chunk of code, and it
> turns out that test was redundant anyway.

Thank you!

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2018-02-23 01:31:10 Re: Translations contributions urgently needed
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2018-02-23 00:51:02 Re: Translations contributions urgently needed