Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing
Date: 2019-05-20 13:47:37
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZPf0MBb8YFdkC5UA67jjv65xxVjBaarezN2kcP_xrhyg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 4:55 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Robert, this indeed looks near trivial. What do you think?

Hmm, yeah, I guess that'd be OK.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-05-20 13:54:48 Re: Remove useless associativity/precedence from parsers
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2019-05-20 13:46:37 Re: Google Season of Docs 2019 - PostgreSQL