Re: Re: BUG #15039: some question about hash index code

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: 自己 <zoulx1982(at)163(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: BUG #15039: some question about hash index code
Date: 2018-02-01 20:33:49
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZHLOP_b+b+E_bWhBP1YsCe7oTDPzfMyTNoOPE7cH_+2g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Attached patch fix_markbufdirty_hash_index_v1.patch fixes the problem
> by calling MarkBufferDirty at the appropriate place in the code.
> However, I noticed that we might end up calling MarkBufferDirty twice
> for metapage in _hash_addovflpage. I think we can easily avoid that
> as is done in patch fix_markbufdirty_hash_index_v1.1.patch.

IIUC, the v1 patch is fixing a bug, but the v1.1 patch is a minor
optimization. I'm going to take the easy way out and push v1 to v10
and master.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Kohn 2018-02-01 22:54:22 Re: BUG #15036: Un-killable queries Hanging in BgWorkerShutdown
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-02-01 15:24:48 Re: BUG #14952: COPY fails to fill in IDENTITY column default value

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-02-01 22:13:06 Re: Cancelling parallel query leads to segfault
Previous Message Vladimir Sitnikov 2018-02-01 20:28:33 Re: Built-in connection pooling