| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Code review focused on new node types added by partitioning supp |
| Date: | 2017-05-30 11:50:25 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ5Rhppi9UdoMBbKOAJmN=508eM6=bekzzFr8ZHANcvig@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> > I'm not really for doing it that way, but I'm willing to apply the fix
>> > if there's consensus for your position. Anybody else have an opinion?
>>
>> I tend to agree with Noah on this one.
>
> +1
+1 from me, too. I don't see that there's enough advantage in
avoiding a catversion bump to justify leaving this footgun behind.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-05-30 13:41:57 | Re: [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Code review focused on new node types added by partitioning supp |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2017-05-30 09:26:00 | Re: [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Code review focused on new node types added by partitioning supp |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mithun Cy | 2017-05-30 12:15:26 | Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-30 11:46:42 | Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take) |