Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)
Date: 2017-05-30 11:46:42
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYE+uuVBUv39bpw+N556joOZQ_mv9hB6V_kNDKOQv7xWw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

I spoke with Kevin about this at PGCon and asked him to have a look at
it. He agreed to do so, but did not specify a time frame, which seems
important.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-05-30 11:50:25 Re: [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Code review focused on new node types added by partitioning supp
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-05-30 11:43:18 Re: pg_resetwal is broken if run from v10 against older version of PG data directory