Re: [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Code review focused on new node types added by partitioning supp

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Code review focused on new node types added by partitioning supp
Date: 2017-05-30 13:41:57
Message-ID: 10367.1496151717@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>> I'm not really for doing it that way, but I'm willing to apply the fix
>>>> if there's consensus for your position. Anybody else have an opinion?

> +1 from me, too. I don't see that there's enough advantage in
> avoiding a catversion bump to justify leaving this footgun behind.

The consensus seems pretty clear. I'll make it so.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-05-30 15:32:47 pgsql: Fix omission of locations in outfuncs/readfuncs partitioning nod
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-05-30 11:50:25 Re: [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Code review focused on new node types added by partitioning supp

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2017-05-30 13:44:25 Re: Walsender timeouts and large transactions
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-05-30 13:10:16 Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.