| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bug tracker tool we need |
| Date: | 2012-04-18 17:26:35 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYtVoLTudMDp+xqZpHBSThTDKSJbrF+O6R7MkuzigTGrg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> BTW, given our heavy reliance on email, let me put a word in here for
> RT, which is 100% email-driven. RT has other limitations, but if your
> goal is to never log into a web interface, it's hard to beat.
If your goal is to never log into a good web interface, it's even
harder to beat.
I actually don't mind logging into a web interface to update
information. That doesn't slow me down much, as long as I can still
also email *without* using the web interface.
Now, RT's web interface is poor. But, if that's what everyone else
likes, I could tolerate it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2012-04-18 17:30:16 | Re: Parameterized-path cost comparisons need some work |
| Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2012-04-18 17:17:37 | Re: Bug tracker tool we need |