Re: Parameterized-path cost comparisons need some work

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Parameterized-path cost comparisons need some work
Date: 2012-04-18 17:30:16
Message-ID: CAM-w4HNVEVV_OgnYJUtcr8eLwwXx7CJMRXw4Qd9RKxMnOFBAkw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I've been hacking away on a patch to do this, and attached is something
> that I think is pretty close to committable.

I have nothing to add but I just wanted to say thank you for taking
the time to write up this explanation. Even when some of us don't
comment on some of the longer, more technical emails, we're definitely
still reading them and I at least find them invaluable for trying to
keep up with the changes over time. It's also been key to establishing
this practice as a good value for other patch authors to try to
emulate.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hakan Kocaman 2012-04-18 17:43:45 Re: Parameterized-path cost comparisons need some work
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-04-18 17:26:35 Re: Bug tracker tool we need