| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bug tracker tool we need |
| Date: | 2012-04-18 19:21:16 |
| Message-ID: | 4F8F142C.6050409@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/18/2012 01:26 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Josh Berkus<josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> BTW, given our heavy reliance on email, let me put a word in here for
>> RT, which is 100% email-driven. RT has other limitations, but if your
>> goal is to never log into a web interface, it's hard to beat.
> If your goal is to never log into a good web interface, it's even
> harder to beat.
>
> I actually don't mind logging into a web interface to update
> information. That doesn't slow me down much, as long as I can still
> also email *without* using the web interface.
>
> Now, RT's web interface is poor. But, if that's what everyone else
> likes, I could tolerate it.
I think it's just frightful, TBH. And I do use the web for tracker
interaction.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2012-04-18 19:50:28 | Re: Bug tracker tool we need |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2012-04-18 19:18:51 | Re: PgNext: Cancelled (sorry for the offtopic) |