Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk
Date: 2020-06-22 15:17:22
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYq2Jfqfs09cTmwbv0eHcj0c5hrDL8wiiFZYOWp3uL+oA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:06 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> This was addressed in 92c58fd94801dd5c81ee20e26c5bb71ad64552a8
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php?title=PostgreSQL_13_Open_Items&diff=34994&oldid=34993

I mean, that's fine, but I am trying to make a more general point
about priorities. Getting the GUCs right is a lot less important than
getting the feature right.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Estes 2020-06-22 16:48:55 Summary of DDL/DML statement return/output values?
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2020-06-22 15:06:30 Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2020-06-22 15:17:47 Assertion failure in pg_copy_logical_replication_slot()
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-06-22 15:13:20 Re: suggest to rename enable_incrementalsort