| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk |
| Date: | 2020-06-22 17:44:47 |
| Message-ID: | 70fd6693fe0ba0e87e9fa83edad819499c517936.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 11:17 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I mean, that's fine, but I am trying to make a more general point
> about priorities. Getting the GUCs right is a lot less important than
> getting the feature right.
What about the feature you are worried that we're getting wrong?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2020-06-22 19:28:14 | Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-06-22 17:43:48 | Re: Summary of DDL/DML statement return/output values? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-06-22 17:52:22 | Re: Asymmetry in opening and closing indices for partition routing |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2020-06-22 17:30:43 | Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk |