| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |
| Date: | 2022-08-03 15:51:57 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYAmUzBuj1mEODnJk5qgzDxdMsXQDoZUdsvuJL7d2Lrew@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 7:15 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Another version of the patch which closes the smgr at the end using
> smgrcloserellocator() and I have also added a commit message.
Hmm, but didn't we decide against doing it that way intentionally? The
comment you're deleting says "If we didn't do this and used the smgr
layer directly, we would have to worry about invalidations."
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2022-08-03 15:55:10 | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2022-08-03 15:30:50 | Re: A test for replay of regression tests |