Re: A test for replay of regression tests

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Date: 2022-08-03 15:30:50
Message-ID: 20220803153050.GC19644@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 12:10:23PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> This adds 2 whole minutes to the recovery check, when running with the
> Windows serial-only scripts on Cirrus CI (using Andres's CI patches).
> For Linux it adds ~20 seconds to the total of -j8 check-world.
> Hopefully that's time well spent, because it adds test coverage for
> all the redo routines, and hopefully soon we won't have to run 'em in
> series on Windows.

Should 027-stream-regress be renamed to something that starts earlier ?
Off-list earlier this year, Andres referred to 000.

--
Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-08-03 15:51:57 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Previous Message Junwang Zhao 2022-08-03 15:14:47 Re: [doc] fix a potential grammer mistake