Re: Allow batched insert during cross-partition updates

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, "gkokolatos(at)pm(dot)me" <gkokolatos(at)pm(dot)me>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Allow batched insert during cross-partition updates
Date: 2022-12-14 13:28:46
Message-ID: CA+HiwqGVVKFSEq8ZavTcrh9OUK52g4JK2R13PcYFL5E7MVqnBw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 6:45 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 8:01 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 5:00 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > Updated patch attached.
> >
> > I will review the patch a bit more, but I think
> > it would be committable.
>
> One thing I noticed is this bit:
>
> -- Clean up
> -DROP TABLE batch_table, batch_cp_upd_test, batch_table_p0,
> batch_table_p1 CASCADE;
> +DROP TABLE batch_table, batch_table_p0, batch_table_p1,
> batch_cp_upd_test, cmdlog CASCADE;
>
> This would be nitpicking, but this as-proposed will not remove remote
> tables created for foreign-table partitions of the partitioned table
> ‘batch_cp_upd_test’. So I modified this a bit further to remove them
> as well. Also, I split this into two, for readability. Another thing
> is a typo in a test-case comment: s/a single INSERTs/a single INSERT/.
> I fixed it as well. Other than that, the patch looks good to me.
> Attached is an updated patch. If there are no objections, I will
> commit the patch.

Thanks for the changes. LGTM.

--
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-12-14 13:39:43 Re: Refactor SCRAM code to dynamically handle hash type and key length
Previous Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2022-12-14 13:05:15 Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys