Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as

From: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: "Markus Schaber" <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as
Date: 2006-09-21 00:23:31
Message-ID: C1372993.2361%llonergan@greenplum.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Markus,

On 9/20/06 11:02 AM, "Markus Schaber" <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com> wrote:

> I thought that posix_fadvise() with POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED was exactly
> meant for this purpose?

This is a good idea - I wasn't aware that this was possible.

We'll do some testing and see if it works as advertised on Linux and
Solaris.

- Luke

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schaber 2006-09-21 07:31:12 Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-09-20 22:05:02 Re: running benchmark test on a 50GB database