| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Mair <chrisnospam(at)1006(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Nuno Alves <nuno(dot)alexandre(dot)alves(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: running benchmark test on a 50GB database |
| Date: | 2006-09-20 22:05:02 |
| Message-ID: | 20060920220502.GE28987@nasby.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 05:47:41PM +0200, Chris Mair wrote:
>
> > I am running bechmark test in a 50 GB postgresql database.
> > I have the postgresql.conf with all parameters by default.
> > In this configuration the database is very, very slow.
> >
> > Could you please tell which is the best configuration?
> >
> > My system:
> > Pentium D 3.0Ghz
> > RAM: 1GB
> > HD: 150GB SATA
>
> We don't know what your database looks like, what the
> queries are you're running, what "very, very
> slow" means for you and what version of PostgreSQL
> on what OS this is :/
>
> The two links are a good starting point to tuning your DB:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/performance-tips.html
> http://www.powerpostgresql.com/PerfList/
Also, 1G is kinda light on memory for a 50G database.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Luke Lonergan | 2006-09-21 00:23:31 | Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as |
| Previous Message | Ron | 2006-09-20 19:35:11 | Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as |