Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2

From: Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2
Date: 2011-02-08 05:16:01
Message-ID: BLU0-SMTP655ED97D557062A68D62E58EEA0@phx.gbl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11-02-07 10:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:

> - The PL/python extravaganza. I'm not really clear where we stand
> with this. There are a lot of patches here.
>

Some of the patches have been committed a few others are ready (or
almost ready) for a committer. The table function one is the only one
in 'waiting for author'

4 of the patches haven't yet received any review. Jan Urbanski has been
pretty good about posting updated patches as the dependent patches get
updated. It would be good if a few people grabbed these. The individual
patches tend to not be that large.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Singer 2011-02-08 05:32:38 Re: pl/python explicit subtransactions
Previous Message Noah Misch 2011-02-08 04:52:01 Re: Re: patch: fix performance problems with repated decomprimation of varlena values in plpgsql