Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2
Date: 2011-02-08 18:45:27
Message-ID: 1297190727.20104.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tis, 2011-02-08 at 00:16 -0500, Steve Singer wrote:
> On 11-02-07 10:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> > - The PL/python extravaganza. I'm not really clear where we stand
> > with this. There are a lot of patches here.
> >
>
> Some of the patches have been committed a few others are ready (or
> almost ready) for a committer. The table function one is the only one
> in 'waiting for author'
>
> 4 of the patches haven't yet received any review. Jan Urbanski has been
> pretty good about posting updated patches as the dependent patches get
> updated. It would be good if a few people grabbed these. The individual
> patches tend to not be that large.

I'm available to commit these if someone else can do the initial review.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-02-08 18:47:48 Re: Add ENCODING option to COPY
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-02-08 18:40:57 MVCC doc typo fix